When an employee’s motivation and performance start to drop, many companies offer a day off or annual leave. Rest is useful, but it rarely changes the cause: the person comes back to the same problem. And at this stage, many employees quietly start looking for a job elsewhere. From the outside, this looks like care. But if nothing changes in the work itself or in how the person understands what is happening, the same tiredness returns within days. Leave can also send a silent message: “Deal with it on your own.”
Support instead of distance
Offering workplace counselling – during working hours – sends a different message: “You matter to us, not only your tasks.” Employees who feel that their organization cares about their well-being are more committed and less likely to leave (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). Counselling is a clear and visible form of this care. It shows that the company sees the person behind the role. It also gives the employee a safe place to talk about what is really going on – before the decision to leave is made. For many people, simply being heard is the first step back to engagement.
Does counselling help?
Research gives a careful “yes”: after workplace counselling, people report fewer psychological problems and take fewer sick days (McLeod, 2010). Counselling helps a person put the problem into words, notice their own patterns and see options they had missed. It is not a quick fix, and it does not work the same way for everyone. But it gives tools that stay with the person after the sessions end. You can read how workplace counselling developed over time in “Where Does the Problem Lie? Four Stages of Workplace Counselling”.
Not instead of rest, but together with it
A person close to burnout needs real recovery, including the chance to mentally switch off from work (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007). So counselling should not replace rest. It helps the person understand what they need – and sometimes that includes time off. Rest without reflection often means coming back to the same overload. Reflection without rest can become one more task on an already full list. The best result usually comes when the two go together, and the employee and the counsellor decide on the right balance.
Confidential for the person, useful for the company
What the employee says stays private. However, the counsellor can share anonymous, combined trends with the company, for example: “workload is a common topic in this department.” This way, the company can fix the causes without knowing who said what. Many causes of burnout – workload, unclear roles, conflicts – are part of the work itself. An employee may be afraid to name them openly. Confidentiality makes it safer to speak, and anonymous feedback lets the organization learn.
In short
A day off pauses the problem. A conversation can change it. For the company, this is not a cost but an investment – in the person, in their commitment and in the future. The employee feels valued, and the company keeps an experienced person. Both sides win when support comes early, before motivation is completely gone.
References
McLeod, J. (2010). The effectiveness of workplace counselling: A systematic review. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(4), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2010.485688
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
Photo: “Corporate Workspace” by Chris George
Leave a Reply